Page 28 - SHELTER
P. 28
THEME PAPER
construction technologies can construction technologies used doi.org/10.1017/S0267190513000019
be an effective alternative to for the building projects as well. Ferrada, X., & Serpell, A. (2014). Selection
conventional techniques in The information presented here of Construction Methods for Construction
the pursuit of cost and time can form the basis for developing Projects: A Knowledge Problem.
Journal of Construction Engineering
effectiveness as well as from decision-making model, which and Management, 140(4), 1–7. https://
sustainability point of view. can help decision makers to rank doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-
Evaluation through qualitative the order of evaluation criteria 7862.0000715
and quantitative factors would for the innovative construction Gopalan, K., & Venkataraman, M. (2015).
be essential to select these technology. The next phase Affordable housing: Policy and practice
in India. IIMB Management Review,
construction technologies for of this research study will be 27(2), 129–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
an affordable housing project. focused on this effort. iimb.2015.03.003
Based on interviews conducted High level task force. (2008). Report of the
with industry experts, this High Level Task Force AFFORDABLE
article has established decision- REFERENCES HOUSING FOR ALL.
making criteria for the Azhar, S., Lukkad, M. Y., & Ahmad, I. McKinsey Global Institute. (2010). India’s
urban awakening : Building inclusive
evaluation of the innovative (2013). An Investigation of Critical Factors cities, sustaining economic growth.
construction technology for and Constraints for Selecting Modular McKinsey Quarterly, (April), 1–33.
affordable housing. The present Construction over Conventional Stick- MoHUA, & NBO. (2012). Report of The
research has identified eight key Built Technique. International Journal of Technical Group On Urban Housing
Construction Education and Research,
evaluation criteria: Economic 9(3), 203–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/15 Shortage (TG-12) (2012-17).
viability, Time, Performance, 578771.2012.723115 Nanyam, V. N., Basu, R., Sawhney, A., &
Constructability, Functionality, BMTPC. (2018). Compendium of Prasad, J. K. (2015). Selection Framework
for Evaluating Housing Technologies.
Procurement, Sustainability, and Prospective Emerging Technologies for Procedia Engineering, 123(December),
Risk factors. Identified criteria Mass Housing. 333–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
and sub-criteria can be further Chen, Y., Okudan, G. E., & Riley, D. R. proeng.2015.10.044
(2010). Decision support for construction
assigned weightage to help method selection in concrete buildings: Nanyam, V. P. S. N., Sawhney, A., &
decision-makers in the selection Prefabrication adoption and optimization. Gupta, P. A. (2017). Evaluating Offsite
Technologies for Affordable Housing.
of an appropriate innovative Automation in Construction, 19(6), Procedia Engineering, 196(June),
construction technology for 665–675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. 135–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
autcon.2010.02.011
the affordable housing project. CII. (2019). Affordable Housing - The proeng.2017.07.183
Also, the merits and demerits of Blue-Eyed Boy of Indian Real Estate. 1–36. Pan, W., Dainty, A. R. J., & Gibb, A. G.
technology in each individual Dale, E., Nobe, M. C., Clevenger, C., F. (2012). Establishing and weighting
decision criteria for building system
category of criteria can be & Cross, J. (2013). Comparing Multi- selection in housing construction.
observed through the project Criteria Decision-Making Methods to Journal of Construction Engineering
evaluation. The identified criteria Select Sustainable Alternatives in the AEC and Management, 138(11), 1239–1250.
Industry. Icsdec, (1995), 818–825. https://
can be used to evaluate other https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-
7862.0000543
26 HUDCO-HSMI Publication
