Page 37 - Shelter - April 2025
P. 37

POLICY REVIEW


              Resource    Mismanagement:      planning frameworks further     integrated    approach     to
              The efficient allocation and    complicates  the  identification   social infrastructure. Such an
              management  of  resources,      of optimal locations for these   approach must redefine social
              both  financial  and  physical,   essential facilities.         infrastructure to cater to the
              is  a  major  challenge.  Many   Funding  Constraints:  Social   diverse needs of informal
              urban development or social     infrastructure       projects   workers while optimising
              welfare programs face  issues   are   capital-intensive  and    land  and  resource  use.  This
              with misallocation or poor      require  substantial  long-term   requires  effective  urban
              management  of  resources.      investment, not only for their   planning,  robust  operations
              Without adequate data or        initial development but also    and maintenance frameworks,
              proper estimates supporting     for ongoing operations  and     financial       sustainability
              the demand for specific         maintenance.     Government     models,     and     equitable
              infrastructure,  these  projects   programs    often     face   distribution of infrastructure
              often    get    deprioritised,   budgetary  constraints  that   across  communities.  In  this
              leading  to  inefficient  use  of   limit the ability to adequately   context,  a  “4-Cs”  strategy  is
              available resources.                                            proposed, which includes the
                                              fund and maintain critical
              Operational     Inefficiencies:  infrastructure such as shelters,   following elements:
              Bureaucratic   delays,   lack   care  centres,  and  livelihood   1.   Contextual Infrastructure
              of   coordination    between    support facilities.                 Planning
              government      departments,    Social and Cultural  Barriers:
              and      inefficient   policy   Informal    workers,    often   A set of clear standards and
              implementation          slow    marginalised  or  stigmatised,   guidelines for city officials
              progress and hinder  the        face difficulties in accessing   and urban planners would
              success of social infrastructure   services specifically designed   go a long way in realising
              projects.  Furthermore,  when   to  meet  their  needs.  Gender   robust and adequate  social
              infrastructure   is    poorly   disparities,   especially   in   infrastructure  in   Indian
              maintained or lacks sufficient   care giving and domestic       cities.  Currently,  the  Urban
              operational  support,  services   work,  further  exacerbate  the   and  Regional  Development
              deteriorate    over     time,   challenges, with women in the   Plan    Formulation      and
              reducing their effectiveness.                                   Implementation     (URDPFI)
                                              informal sector facing even
              Low importance in policy and    greater barriers to accessing   Guidelines only acknowledge
              planning frameworks: Policies   support services and social     night shelters (or shelters
              aimed at supporting informal    infrastructure.   Social   and   for  the  urban  homeless)
              workers is usually focused      cultural  factors  like  caste,   and suggests providing a
              on welfare and not planning     class and ethnicity present     maximum  of  1,000  sqm,
              as  well  as  often  lack  clarity,   significant  challenges  in  subject to availability of
              consistency,  and  coherence.   integrating informal workers    land   for   every    10-lakh
              Additionally,        frequent   into   urban    development     population. As per the Assam
              changes    in  policies   can   initiatives.                    State  Livelihood  Mission,
              disrupt  long-term  planning                                    the  establishment  of  8  City
              and  cause  delays  in  project   Opportunities          and    Livelihood Centres will be
              implementation. The absence     Recommendations                 permissible for population
              of integrated development       Given the myriad challenges,    more    than     10   lakhs .
                                                                                                          3
              plans that incorporate social   there is a pressing need        Guidelines for other desirable
              infrastructure into larger urban   for a comprehensive and      social infrastructure facilities

              3   https://dohua.assam.gov.in/portlet-innerpage/city-livelihoods-centreclc

                                                              April, 2025, Volume 26. No.1 - SHELTER    35
   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42