Page 63 - SHELTER
P. 63
POLICY REVIEW
significance of the small scale booming real estate and In Mumbai, Free housing is a type
activities. economy created new demand of a housing stock, generated
for urban land among the local, by the state government to deal
DEVELOPMENT middle and upper classes and with the urban sprawl caused by
PRESSURE elites (Banerjee- Guha 2002; slums in the form of mainstream
The Under-secretary General Nijman 2000). Increasing foreign housing units crossed subsidised
and Executive Director of capital flows, opportunities and through a profit making tool
UN-Habitat, criticised that earning aspirations attracted as a sale component. In 2012,
general lack of attention to the elite desires for a city with world- Columbian government had
urbanisation of poverty on the class transport infrastructure, also announced a ‘free housing’
part of policymakers, shelter leisure, and upscale residences policy for the urban poor, that
issues continued to fall between (Fernandes, 2004). This scenario would provide free homes to
the cracks and were hardly created an affordable housing 1,00,000 families every year.
reflected in discussions, even at crunch for urban poor. This Over the years, Columbian
international forums. Whereas wave of neo-liberalised vision government had taken efforts
UN-Habitat estimated in 2005 facilitated slum-clearance by to address adequate housing
that the current population of leveraging the market to resettle for poor families includes:
slum dwellers was expected to the urban poor. So, the market rent control, building public
double by 2030. Many countries would create a ‘win-win’ housing, subsidised interest
had chosen ‘slum upgradation solution, addressing housing rates, offering subsidies for
’ as a central approach to deal for the poor and redevelopment buying homes, rental vouchers,
with urban poor in which desires for the upper classes. slum upgrading. These
UN-Habitat emphasised on However, redeveloping slums approaches never managed
identification of ‘finance gap’ could not serve equitable to solve problems of adequate
(Branwen Gruffydd Jones, benefits to all slum dwellers, it housing solutions. (Gilbert,
2012). But slum proliferation was beneficial for evicted slum- 2001; UN-Habitat, 2011a). Every
in the metropolitan cities dwellers who could furnish government in Latin America,
increases complexities for an documentary proof of residency and many beyond, is convinced
approach like slum upgradation in Mumbai prior to the ‘cut- that the only house worth having
as land is scarcely available. off date’ of January 1, 1995. is a home of one’s own (Alan
And Mumbai’s transforming Later, a newly created slum Gilbert, 2014).
landscape, favoring the vision of rehabilitation policy SRA, based During 1948, Latin American
world class infrastructure either on ‘market oriented model ’ had President Mariano Ospina was
resulted into slum evictions or offered incentives to private arguing that ‘home ownership
rehabilitation which are giving developers to build tenements made people feel secure and
birth to innovative policies. The for slum dwellers free of cost more at one with society.’ Home
decade of 1985-1995 is known as (Sapana Doshi, 2013). ownership being an official
a period of significant change in FREE HOUSING- AN policy in Columbia benefits
redevelopment and resettlement EFFECTIVE WAY? the govt. in two ways: first,
policies and practice in the city. it stimulates the construction
In the early 1900s, Mumbai’s A Case Study industry which is directly helpful
1 Alan Gilbert: A researcher and his area of research is urbanisation and poverty in developing countries like Latine America and South Afrca
2 Slum upgradation: Includes improvement of physical infrastructure, access to the municipal basic services, household upgradation and strengthening
tenure security.
3 Market oriented model: Market oriented model refers to debts and equity investments which enables capital flow in the market.
October 2020 Volume 21 No. 2-SHELTER 61