Page 96 - SHELTER
P. 96
CASE STUDIES
• They prepare the detailed 2. High slum population and land 3. Land for Transit
architectural and structural coverage: Growing populations Accommodations – Use of
drawings including the and urban migration have Alternate vacant land for
project implementation resulted in occupation of transit accommodation by
framework and also manage large percentages of the city developer is not financially
the finances through its own by squatter settlements. viable, however an alternative
funds or arranging funds by 3. Real Estate Cost: The land government land for transit
foreign direct investments transferred from the accommodation on rent is a
or domestic funds through government to the developers more viable (on the lines of
international lenders. replaces the need for a DMRC Projects).
• The developer also assists government subsidy; in fact, 4. FAR –Project should be treated
the beneficiaries in forming the government gains from as one entity and Unused
an association / RWA of the the 25% premium paid by FAR from Rehabilitation part
beneficiaries for the purpose developers and leverages the should be allowed to be used
of operation and maintenance capacity and expertise of the in remunerative component,
for a period of 5 years. private sector in real estate and incentive of 1.5*FAR in
• The sale of remunerative development. remunerative component
components by the developer However, a major challenge should be given as it’s a
will only be possible after the faced by developer are as redevelopment project.
completion and handover follows. 5. Density -900 DU per Ha. is
of the completed EWS 1. Slum Clearance – The insufficient to accommodate
residential components to developer does not want population in some slum
DDA. to get involved in slum pockets, hence it requires
• The developer shall clearance and government relaxation.
mandatorily provide all the intervention is sought to CASE STUDY
basic amenities/infrastructure be suitable. Vacation of Site
(water, electricity, sanitation should be done by DDA in About 14 JJ (Jhuggi Jhopri)
facilities) under the line with Kathputli colony clusters covered in 7 projects
rehabilitation scheme besides development and vacant site having approximately 20677
providing houses to the should be provided to the households are being taken
beneficiaries. developer up across Delhi in Phase
Factors imperative to make in- 2. EWS Component handover- 1 of redevelopment. This
situ redevelopment successful - Developer should be allowed paper analyses a case from
the perspective of providing
Following are the main attributes to take up construction affordable housing to urban
of the slum rehabilitation of rehabilitation and poor under In Situ Slum
model which enable in-situ remunerative component Rehabilitation PMAY (U) in
redevelopment scheme to work simultaneously, sales of slums of Shalimar Bagh and
well: remunerative component Pitampura in Delhi. The study
can be allowed, however
1. Land Scarcity: Land scarcity in possession should be allowed of slum has been conducted at
the strategic locations near to only after handover of EWS settlement level and dwelling
major economic centres. component. unit level and highlights the
current situation of slum and
94 HUDCO-HSMI Publication
