Page 47 - HUDCO-SHELTER-APR21
P. 47

POLICY REVIEW


         and Nashik (Rs. 2,092 crore).      limited private investment in  India was launched in 2015 to
                                            infrastructure is the absence of a  a ract  investment,  driving
         Most importantly, in the case of
         both  bus  and  rail-based         revenue model, for example,  economic growth, improving the
                                            through levy and collection of  quality of life for people and
         infrastructural development, the
         budget extends the transport       appropriate user charges and  thereby se ing a virtuous circle
                                            this, in turn, makes a large part  of growth and development.
         outlay to peripheral areas of
                                            of the urban infrastructure sector  However,  even  after  the
         Tier-1 cities primarily through
         the greener and cheaper light      financially non-viable. Lack of    completion of five years, the
         rail systems. These initiatives    enabling  PPP  legislation,  a    physical progress of the SCM
         would not only shorten the         multiplicity of agencies, lack of   has not been as per the expected
         travel time to work and thereby    ability to select and structure a   lines  and  the  BE  for  SCM
         facilitate effective urban labour   PPP project, lack of political will   remains the same between the
         market  integration  but  also     towards project implementation,   FY  2020-21  and  2021-22  at
         entail positive impacts on the     and lack of citizen participation   Rs.6,450 crore. The RE for FY
         urban environment and public       further complicates the entire    2020-21 for SCM was Rs. 3,400
         health.                            process  of  formulation  and     crore, almost half of the BE,
                                            implementation of PPPs.           suggesting a continued trend in
         The role of Indian urbanization
         would receive a further boost      In general, technically simple  the implementation lag.
         through       the     National     projects, with small gestation    Moreover, there has been no
         Infrastructure Pipeline (NIP)      periods and lesser uncertainty    change  in  the  budgetary
         that was announced last year. A    have  become  successful  in      provisions for AMRUT as well,
         combination of an investment       Indian cities. So, the key to this   the  BE  remains  the  same
         outlay of over Rs.103 lakh crore   approach lies in implementation   between the FY 2020-21 and
         and more than 7000 projects;       and execution- crafting a PPP     2021-22 at Rs.7,300 crore (RE for
         several industrial corridors like   model with a well-defined role    FY 2020-21 was Rs.6,450 crore).
         Bharatmala, Sagarmala, etc.; a     of the private sector as well as   Overall,    for   the    urban
         thrust on exports from each        clear visibility on both costs and   rejuvenation missions- SCM and
         district  and Make in India push   risks  leading  to  a  higher     AMRUT, the BE outlay was
         through the Production Linked      probability of long-term project   Rs.13,750 crore for the FY 2021-
         Incentive Scheme (PLI) covering    viability. The vulnerability of the   22, which was the same as FY
         13 sectors, and; a financial outlay   urban poor can be addressed     2020-21 (RE for FY 2020-21 was
         of around Rs. 2 lakh crore under   through  the  adoption  of  an    Rs.9,850 crore).
         the AatmaNirbhar Bharat, have      independent         regulatory
                                            mechanism. This would facilitate  As opposed to the centralized
         the potential to make a positive
         impact.                            accurate assessment as well as    “one-size-fits-all” approach of
                                            monitoring of cost of service     JNNURM, the urban mission of
         However, an overt emphasis on      delivery  leveraging  smart
         PPP causes some discomfort as      technology and use of a cross-    SCM and AMRUT provide some
         the outcomes of such projects      subsidy model of differential      degree  of  flexibility  in  the
         have had a mixed experience  in    user charges across different      formulation,  approval,  and
         Indian cities. Even under the      user  groups  to  ensure  cost    implementation of projects at the
         Smart  Cities  Mission,  the       recovery at an overall level.     state and local level (Sadoway et
         contribution of the private sector                                   al., 2018). The AMRUT statement
         through the PPP initiatives has    URBAN  REJUVENATION               delineates specific criteria for the
         been approximately 20 percent      MISSIONS: SMART CITIES &          selection  of  cities,  reform
         of the total fund requirement.     AMRUT                             conditionalities and financial
         One of the main reasons for  Smart Cities Mission (SCM) in
                                                                              provisions. The Service Level




                                                                          April 2021 Volume 22 No. 1- SHELTER  45
   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52