Page 54 - HUDCO-SHELTER-APR21
P. 54
POLICY REVIEW
spaces created through informal economic class and gender? By caring for the elderly etc. Hence,
processes has led to unsafe taking example of footpath as a they use private spaces much
situations at times. public space, this paper tries to more than public spaces. Males
Public Space is a space, which is understand effective utilization are involved in productive
supposed to be used equitably of spaces through study of activities and use public spaces
by all including physically gender, government policies and more than females to carry out
challenged, people belonging to usage of footpath as a public their social and economic
different kind of communities space. responsibilities (Grundstorm
i.e. LGBT (Lesbian, Gay, Bi- LITERATURE REVIEW 2005). During planning of
sexual and Transgender) and Gender Neutrality and footpaths, gender characteristics
different kind of challenges Optimisation of Public Spaces are often ignored. Public spaces
faced by persons of different age need to be designed in such a
Public spaces entail equal access way that they are safe and
groups especially children and
to all the people living in cities. inclusive towards women. Due
old age persons. Hence, public
During planning of public to safety concerns, many women
spaces shall help in creating safe
spaces, the relation between prefer private public spaces i.e.
and resilient cities within a
gender and their respective public spaces with restriction on
region. The role of planners is
activities is either neglected or entry such as malls etc.
important to ensure an equitable
given very li le a ention. Although the economic
and justifiable society where
Whether female need of public restriction imposed on such
spaces are created to be usable
spaces is more than male's is public spaces can lead to
by all and not exclusively by a
difficult to prove; however, it exclusivity but such restrictions
privileged few. All includes
can be safely said that women can eliminate perceived threats
people from all sections of
occupy these spaces for (Munshi 2014).
society in terms of caste,
collective interaction more than
whether it shall be considered as Footpath as a Public Space
males. The safety for women has
reserved classes i.e. Open Footpath- a part of road, is
been more viewed as safety
General (OG), Schedule Caste considered as a public space. It is
against physical assault whereas
(SC), Schedule Tribe (ST), Other as significant as the constructed
for women's safety safe spaces
Backward Class (OBC); road, which accommodates
need to be a ma er of concern
economic classes i.e. Vaishyas, transportation by vehicles
for urban planners and city
Shudras, Brahmins and (Srilertchaipanij 2014). It is a
managers (Nair 2014). Public
Kshatriya; income groups basic requirement to connect
space management needs to gain
classified as High Income pedestrians from one destination
a centrality position in public
Groups (HIG), Middle Income to another. The fundamental role
discourses (Carmona, Magalhaes
Groups (MIG), Lower Income of footpath space is, therefore, to
and Hammond 2008). Public
Groups (LIG) or Economically facilitate the pedestrians'
spaces are designed for neutral
Weaker Section (EWS) or Gender commuting activities by foot
users. The division of labour
classes i.e. Male or Female. Is it (Neal 2010). However, footpath
between men and women results
important to begin with one is also used for many other
into different use of public and
category and go in hierarchy in formal (public) facilities such as
private spaces. Females are
descending category so as not to electrical poles, provision of R.O.
mainly engaged in domestic
offend anyone or neutrality shall water, sanitation,
activities such as childcare,
be exercised for social class, telecommunication facilities, bus
52 HUDCO-HSMI Publication