Page 11 - SHELTER
P. 11

THEME PAPER

          increases in urban areas, putting   sub-human living conditions  THE GENESIS OF
          increasing pressure on land,       with improper sanitation and  AFFORDABLE
          civic  infrastructure, especially   hygiene, inadequate drinking     HOUSING SHORTAGE
          transportation, water supply,      water, and poor quality of shelter
          sewerage,     drainage,    open    (HPEC, 2011).The  bulk of the     As reported by Census 2011, 2.43
          spaces, etc. However, affordable   urban poor gets employed and      million urban households had
          housing  and  basic  amenities     accommodated  in the informal     no exclusive room, compared to
          have not grown at the same         sector  in  these  urban areas.   1.25 million in 2001; 25.34 million
          pace as urbanization, and India    Lack of affordable housing,       were living in one room in 2011
          is struggling to deal with the     workplaces and basic amenities,   as against 18.85 million in 2001.
          reality of its urban future.       including public transport and    The number residing in one room
                                                                               or  less  constituted 35.2%  of  the
          With rising urban population       absence of skills for urban jobs,   total number of households  in
          growth due to natural increase,    etc. affects their productivity and   urban areas in 2011—marginally
          migration and reclassification     remittance capacity adversely     reduced from the figure of 37.4%
          factors, the urban sector of       and accentuates misery in the     in 2001 (Mishra and Mohanty,
          India is suffering  from an        countryside.  Adequate  housing   2017).14.99  million  (80%  of
          extreme housing shortage, the      in cities can alleviate poverty   the urban  households) live in
          bulk of which  fall under  the     by  improving people’s health     congested houses  and require
          Economically  Weaker Section       and making them productive,       new houses, whereas 3% of
          (EWS)    and   Lower    Income     increasing their living standards   the urban households  live in
          Group (LIG) categories. The        and    increasing   urban-rural   homeless  conditions.  Around
          biggest  bottleneck in providing   money transfers. However, the     5% (0.99 million) and 12% (2.27
          affordable housing to the urban    widening gaps between demand      million) of the urban households
          poor, including migrants is        for and supply of affordable      live in non-serviceable kutcha
          the lack of suitable, litigation-  housing and inadequate housing    and    obsolescent   houses.The
          free, adequately serviced  urban   finance solutions have forced the   Ministry  of   Housing    and
          land that is also located at a     urban poor to seek shelter in     Urban     Poverty   Alleviation,
          reasonable commuting distance      highly congested slums, making    Government of India estimated
          from their workplaces (Mishra      them subject to health hazards.   housing shortage in India at 18.78
          and  Mohanty, 2017). The  poor     In this context, the paper explores   million in 2010, with 96 percent
          and low-income groups in cities    the genesis  of the affordable    or 17.6 million pertaining to
          in India get completely weeded     housing shortage and highlights   Economically  Weaker Sections
          out of formal urban land markets   the failure of the city master    and  Lower Income  Groups
          in the process of urban planning,   plan. Given the significance  of   (MoHUPA     2010,    Mohanty
          which is based on the concept of   affordable housing in the Habitat   2014).  According  to the Expert
          “master plan” and a “command       III  New Urban  Agenda,  the      Committee of MoHUPA, only
          and control” paradigm.             paper dwells on an affordable     50% of the EWS live in pucca
          Failure in  planning has  led  to   housing strategy,  with a focus   houses;  all  the people  living
          large scale exclusion, resulting   on empirical experience and       in the kutcha  houses belong  to
          in substitute systems outside      suggestions  for  the adoption  of   mostly EWS (10%) and LIG (2%);
          the formal frameworks.  A          IZ and IH in India.               only 0.5% of Middle Income
          quarter of the urban population                                      Groups (MIG) live in kutcha
          lives in overcrowded slums in




                                                                        October 2020 Volume 21 No. 2-SHELTER  9
   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16