Page 81 - Shelter-October-2022
P. 81

CASE STUDIES


              quality-related;         and    highest rating while housing    is important to consider
              infrastructure    provisions.   operation costs received the    the   preferences   of    the
              Using a three-point Likert      lowest rating. This finding     target groups and a better
              scale,  the  best  facilities  were   suggests  that  environmental   connection between various
              given a higher score (score     and     sustainable   factors   stakeholders  involved,  for
              3), while the worst possible    were  not  taken  into  account   the  timely  completion  of  the
              alternative   received    the   when planning the project’s     project. Since affordability
              lowest  value  (score  1),  as   delivery.                      is   crucial   for   gaining
              shown in Table 2.                                               beneficiaries’  consent,  the
                                              CONCLUSION                      slum   resettlement   project
              After calculating the combined   For a successful and high      was evaluated  from two
              average scores of five factors,                                 viewpoints, namely financial
              we found that infrastructure    success  rate  of  any  slum    affordability and affordability
              provision     received    the   rehabilitation   project,   it  of  non-housing  components.

              Table 2: Selected parameters for Quality of Life in insitu- slum resettlement project

               Variables   Factors           Parameters                               Score    Aggregate
                   F1      Households        The functionality of the housing           2         1.75
                           satisfaction      facility
                                             End user’s satisfaction with the           1
                                             housing facility
                                             Maintainability of housing facility        2
                                             Safety performance (crime)                 2
                   F2      Stakeholders’     Timely completion of the project           1         1.66
                           Satisfaction      Project team satisfaction                  2
                                             Reduced occurrence of disputes and         2
                                             litigation
                   F3      Housing           The energy efficiency of the housing       1         1.33
                           Operation cost    facility
                                             The reduced lifecycle cost of housing      2
                                             Environmental performance of               1
                                             housing facility (Eco-friendly)
                   F4      Quality related   Quality performance of the project         2          2.0
                                             Aesthetically pleasing view of             3
                                             completed house
                                             Technology transfer                        1
                                             Technical specification of housing         2
                   F5      Infrastructure    Water supply                               3         2.25
                           provisions        Drainage and sewerage                      2
                                             Solid waste management                     1
                                             Electricity connection                     3
              Source: Compiled by Authors (2020)



                                                           October, 2022, Volume 23. No.2 - SHELTER     79
   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86